Action-board monster, Tetris-y plunder
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/177736
A Feast for Odin is a heavy game (weight 9/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (10/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting. There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, A Feast for Odin is closest to Carnegie (92% profile match) but scores higher on weight (9 vs. 8).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
A Feast for Odin is a heavy game (weight 9/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (10/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 2/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (7/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 2/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (7/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from A Feast for Odin's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay A Feast for Odin against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →