Climate-policy co-op
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/334986
Daybreak is a light game (weight 3/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (7/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting. Players are constantly affecting each other's plans (interaction 8/10). Direct attacks are minimal (0/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Daybreak is closest to Marvel Champions: The Card Game (90% profile match) but scores lower on negotiation (3 vs. 5).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Daybreak is a light game (weight 3/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (7/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
Players are constantly affecting each other's plans (interaction 8/10). Direct attacks are minimal (0/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 3/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is fully baked into the mechanics (10/10) — mechanics and fiction are inseparable. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 6/10). There's some narrative flavor (narrative 5/10).
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 3/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is fully baked into the mechanics (10/10) — mechanics and fiction are inseparable. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 6/10). There's some narrative flavor (narrative 5/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Daybreak's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Daybreak against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →