D&D-flavored gateway worker placement
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/110327
Lords of Waterdeep is a light game (weight 3/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (6/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting. There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 6/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (3/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Lords of Waterdeep is closest to Five Tribes (96% profile match) but scores lower on depth (6 vs. 7).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Lords of Waterdeep is a light game (weight 3/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (6/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 6/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (3/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (4/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. Tempo is steady (engine 4/10) — no big-payoff combo turns.
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (4/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. Tempo is steady (engine 4/10) — no big-payoff combo turns.
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Lords of Waterdeep's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Lords of Waterdeep against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →