Industrialist empire-building, four-action loop
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/310873
Carnegie is a heavy game (weight 8/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (9/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (7/10) — engaged without being exhausting. There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Carnegie is closest to Galactic Cruise (95% profile match) but scores higher on weight (8 vs. 7).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Carnegie is a heavy game (weight 8/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (9/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (7/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (6/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. The engine-building arc is strong (engine 8/10) — early-game investments pay off in explosive late-game turns.
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (6/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. The engine-building arc is strong (engine 8/10) — early-game investments pay off in explosive late-game turns.
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Carnegie's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Carnegie against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →