Push-your-luck deckbuilder dungeon
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/365717
Clank! Catacombs is a light game (weight 3/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (6/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decisions come at a steady pace (5/10) — engaged without being exhausting. There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 6/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct conflict exists but is contained (4/10).
Of every game in our catalog, Clank! Catacombs is closest to Dune: Imperium (87% profile match) but scores lower on weight (3 vs. 5).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Clank! Catacombs is a light game (weight 3/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (6/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decisions come at a steady pace (5/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 6/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct conflict exists but is contained (4/10).
Most variance is input randomness (7/10): luck arrives before your decision and you plan around it. Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (6/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10). There's some narrative flavor (narrative 5/10).
Most variance is input randomness (7/10): luck arrives before your decision and you plan around it. Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (6/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10). There's some narrative flavor (narrative 5/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Clank! Catacombs's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Clank! Catacombs against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →