Gateway dice-driven worker placement
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/34635
Stone Age is a light game (weight 3/10). Strategic depth is moderate (5/10) — pleasant to learn, but not infinitely deep. Decisions come at a steady pace (5/10) — engaged without being exhausting. There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Stone Age is closest to Catan (87% profile match) but scores lower on negotiation (0 vs. 4).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Stone Age is a light game (weight 3/10). Strategic depth is moderate (5/10) — pleasant to learn, but not infinitely deep. Decisions come at a steady pace (5/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 5/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (5/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 5/10).
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 5/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (5/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 5/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Stone Age's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Stone Age against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →