Evolutionary area-control
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/62219
Dominant Species is a heavy game (weight 8/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (10/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting. Interaction is maxed (9/10) — every turn shapes what your opponents can do. Direct conflict is high (7/10) — friendships will be tested.
Of every game in our catalog, Dominant Species is closest to Imperial Struggle (89% profile match) but scores higher on negotiation (2 vs. 0).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Dominant Species is a heavy game (weight 8/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (10/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
Interaction is maxed (9/10) — every turn shapes what your opponents can do. Direct conflict is high (7/10) — friendships will be tested.
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (8/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 6/10). There's some narrative flavor (narrative 6/10).
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (8/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 6/10). There's some narrative flavor (narrative 6/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Dominant Species's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Dominant Species against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →