Multi-area WP with influence chains
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/196340
Yokohama is a medium game (weight 5/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (7/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting. There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 6/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Yokohama is closest to Tekhenu: Obelisk of the Sun (95% profile match) but scores lower on depth (7 vs. 8).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Yokohama is a medium game (weight 5/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (7/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 6/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (2/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (5/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (5/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Yokohama's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Yokohama against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →