Storyteller-curated information, no elimination
Blood on the Clocktower is a medium game (weight 5/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (9/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decision density is intense (8/10) — expect brain-burn and the occasional bout of AP. Interaction is maxed (10/10) — every turn shapes what your opponents can do. Direct conflict is high (7/10) — friendships will be tested. And table-talk diplomacy is essential (negotiation 10/10) — winning requires persuasion.
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Blood on the Clocktower is a medium game (weight 5/10). Despite the modest rules footprint, the decision space is deep (9/10) — the kind of game that rewards a dozen plays. Decision density is intense (8/10) — expect brain-burn and the occasional bout of AP.
Interaction is maxed (10/10) — every turn shapes what your opponents can do. Direct conflict is high (7/10) — friendships will be tested. And table-talk diplomacy is essential (negotiation 10/10) — winning requires persuasion.
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 4/10). Catch-up is moderate (5/10).
The theme is fully baked into the mechanics (9/10) — mechanics and fiction are inseparable. Tempo is steady (engine 2/10) — no big-payoff combo turns. And the game tells a story (narrative 8/10) — sessions have arc and consequences.
Variance is moderate (input 5, output 4/10). Catch-up is moderate (5/10).
The theme is fully baked into the mechanics (9/10) — mechanics and fiction are inseparable. Tempo is steady (engine 2/10) — no big-payoff combo turns. And the game tells a story (narrative 8/10) — sessions have arc and consequences.
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Want to overlay Blood on the Clocktower against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the comparator →