Worker placement + tableau, charming critters
Everdell is a medium game (weight 5/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (7/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting. There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (1/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Everdell is a medium game (weight 5/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (7/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
There's meaningful but indirect interaction (interaction 5/10) — shared resources, catch-up effects, or watch-and-react moments. Direct attacks are minimal (1/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 0/10). Catch-up is moderate (5/10).
The theme is well-integrated (7/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 0/10). Catch-up is moderate (5/10).
The theme is well-integrated (7/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Want to overlay Everdell against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the comparator →