Rosenberg 2P epic farming engine
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/159675
Fields of Arle is a medium-heavy game (weight 7/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (9/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (7/10) — engaged without being exhausting. Interaction is light (3/10); it leans toward parallel play. Direct attacks are minimal (1/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Fields of Arle is closest to Hallertau (92% profile match) but scores higher on weight (7 vs. 6).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Fields of Arle is a medium-heavy game (weight 7/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (9/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (7/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
Interaction is light (3/10); it leans toward parallel play. Direct attacks are minimal (1/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is low across the board (input 3/10, output 0/10) — this is a skill game with little to blame the dice for. Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (7/10). The engine-building arc is strong (engine 9/10) — early-game investments pay off in explosive late-game turns. There's some narrative flavor (narrative 5/10).
Variance is low across the board (input 3/10, output 0/10) — this is a skill game with little to blame the dice for. Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (7/10). The engine-building arc is strong (engine 9/10) — early-game investments pay off in explosive late-game turns. There's some narrative flavor (narrative 5/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Fields of Arle's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Fields of Arle against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →