Gloomhaven sequel — crunchier tactical co-op
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/295770
Frosthaven is a medium-heavy game (weight 7/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (9/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (7/10) — engaged without being exhausting. Players are constantly affecting each other's plans (interaction 8/10). Direct attacks are minimal (0/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Frosthaven is closest to ISS Vanguard (89% profile match) but scores higher on depth (9 vs. 7).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Frosthaven is a medium-heavy game (weight 7/10). The decision tree is among the deepest in the hobby (9/10), with meaningful long-term planning every turn. Decisions come at a steady pace (7/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
Players are constantly affecting each other's plans (interaction 8/10). Direct attacks are minimal (0/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 4/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (8/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10). And the game tells a story (narrative 9/10) — sessions have arc and consequences.
Variance is moderate (input 6, output 4/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme is well-integrated (8/10). There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10). And the game tells a story (narrative 9/10) — sessions have arc and consequences.
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Frosthaven's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Frosthaven against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →