Real-time alien trading, no attacks
BGG · boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/202426
Sidereal Confluence is a medium-heavy game (weight 6/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (8/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decision density is intense (8/10) — expect brain-burn and the occasional bout of AP. Interaction is maxed (10/10) — every turn shapes what your opponents can do. Direct attacks are minimal (1/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression. And table-talk diplomacy is essential (negotiation 10/10) — winning requires persuasion.
Of every game in our catalog, Sidereal Confluence is closest to The Crew: Mission Deep Sea (81% profile match) but scores higher on weight (6 vs. 3).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Sidereal Confluence is a medium-heavy game (weight 6/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (8/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decision density is intense (8/10) — expect brain-burn and the occasional bout of AP.
Interaction is maxed (10/10) — every turn shapes what your opponents can do. Direct attacks are minimal (1/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression. And table-talk diplomacy is essential (negotiation 10/10) — winning requires persuasion.
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 0/10). Catch-up is moderate (5/10).
The theme provides flavor (4/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 0/10). Catch-up is moderate (5/10).
The theme provides flavor (4/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Sidereal Confluence's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Sidereal Confluence against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →