Market-interaction euro
Clans of Caledonia is a medium-heavy game (weight 6/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (7/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting. Players are constantly affecting each other's plans (interaction 7/10). Direct attacks are minimal (3/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Of every game in our catalog, Clans of Caledonia is closest to Terra Nova (92% profile match) but scores higher on weight (6 vs. 5).
Every score is on a 0–10 scale. The rubric and methodology behind these numbers is documented in the README.
Clans of Caledonia is a medium-heavy game (weight 6/10). It offers a substantial decision tree (7/10) — enough to reward repeated study. Decisions come at a steady pace (6/10) — engaged without being exhausting.
Players are constantly affecting each other's plans (interaction 7/10). Direct attacks are minimal (3/10) — the friction comes from contention, not aggression.
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (6/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Variance is moderate (input 4, output 1/10). Catch-up is moderate (4/10).
The theme provides flavor (6/10) but the experience is mostly mechanical. There's a clear engine-building feel (engine 7/10).
Ranked by weighted Euclidean distance across the 12-axis profile, using the default research-weighted lens. Click any game to see its full profile.
Answers derived directly from Clans of Caledonia's 12-axis profile.
Want to overlay Clans of Caledonia against a candidate game and see exactly where they diverge? Open it in the lens →